In Bruce’s latest post hecites a study where people preferred AI therapists over human ones. I don’t doubt the findings. AI can be patient, responsive, and nonjudgmental in ways that busy, burnt-out professionals sometimes struggle to be. But here’s the thing: for me, being heard isn’t the same as being held. There’s something about real human empathy that goes beyond the words being said, it's about presence, nuance, and a mutual recognition.
When we talk to AI, we are still (for now) simulating conversation. It can be extraordinary, insightful, even comforting, but it isn’t a shared human experience. It doesn’t know what it’s like to be us. Empathy is not just about emotional response; it's about lived context.
Here’s a metaphor I keep coming back to: AI might one day make music so beautiful it brings us to tears. We’ll stream it, playlist it, let it soundtrack our lives. But it won’t be the same as going to see Beyoncé, Harry Styles, or Coldplay (or whatever your music of choice is) perform live. It won’t be the same as watching them on a podcast, talking about the heartbreak behind a lyric, the joy behind a melody. Because the human story behind the art is part of what makes it powerful.
The same goes for leadership, storytelling, creativity, coaching, even product design. AI can draft, assist, and accelerate,but the most compelling, sticky, resonant work? That still comes from humans. Our flaws, our questions, our courage, our contradictions.